On 4/30/13 7:45 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
So my personal opinion is that this is a valid discussion to be having
even if we're having it again in IETF LC.
Folks,
This document is *not* in IETF LC. A particular WG member, who was
apparently upset with the tone of the argument on the SPFBIS and DNSEXT
list, expressed his upset by cross-posting to the IETF list, claiming
this had something to do with the "IETF Diversity" topic.
Then a bunch of other SPFBIS and DNSEXT folks blindly used "Reply-All",
resulting in us all seeing this discussion.
I will leave it to the chairs/sergeants-of-arms of the respective lists
to decide how they want to deal with this, but personally I think this
discussion is not useful to have on the IETF list at the moment and
suggest that folks be more careful of their use of "Reply-All". I also
suggest that cross-posting to a new list without noting that in the body
of the message is bad netiquette.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478