Noreply (was: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-09.txt> (A YANG Data Model for IP Management) to Proposed Standard)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Clint,
At 13:39 22-04-2013, Clint Chaplin wrote:
Why did this (and the other most recent) last call also not go to IETF-Announce?

Here are some partial headers:

  From: The IESG <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
  To: IETF-Announce:;
  Subject: Last Call: <draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10.txt> (A YANG Data
        Model for Interface Management) to Proposed Standard
  Message-ID: <20130419132524.1622.39563.idtracker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 06:25:24 -0700
  Cc: netmod@xxxxxxxx
  Reply-To: IETF Discussion List <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
  List-Id: "IETF announcement list. No discussions." <ietf-announce.ietf.org>
  List-Post: <mailto:ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>

I don't know who had the idea [1] to have the IESG use the noreply@xxxxxxxx email address [2]. The List-Post: mailto needs some work. :-)

Regards,
-sm

1. Mornië alantië
2. In all cases, the "From:" field REALLY [RFC6919] SHOULD NOT contain any mailbox that does not belong to the author(s) of the message.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]