Barry
On Friday, April 12, 2013, The IESG wrote:
On Friday, April 12, 2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Improving Awareness of Running Code: the Implementation Status
Section'
<draft-sheffer-running-code-04.txt> as Experimental RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2013-05-10. Exceptionally, comments may be
sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document describes a simple process that allows authors of
Internet-Drafts to record the status of known implementations by
including an Implementation Status section. This will allow
reviewers and working groups to assign due consideration to documents
that have the benefit of running code, by considering the running
code as evidence of valuable experimentation and feedback that has
made the implemented protocols more mature.
The process in this document is offered as an experiment. Authors of
Internet-Drafts are encouraged to consider using the process for
their documents, and working groups are invited to think about
applying the process to all of their protocol specifications. The
authors of this document intend to collate experiences with this
experiment and to report them to the community.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-running-code/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-running-code/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.