That's the tail wagging the dog. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:19:55PM -0300, Arturo Servin wrote: > > Yes, but then you would end up with a large registration form that > people may decide not to complete at all. > > > .as > > On 4/11/13 1:58 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote: > > questions must be optional to answer too. > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Toerless Eckert <eckert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> When adding diversity questions to the registration form, i think there should > >> be a very crisp description, whom exactly this information is made available to, > >> and how it is meant to be used. > >> > >> If the total stats for example are simply made available publically and there > >> are not also other stats like the ones i asked for, then the effort will just > >> reinforce bogus statistical claims. > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:33:21PM -0300, Arturo Servin wrote: > >>> > >>> On 4/11/13 1:00 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote: > >>>> if you do add questions about diversity, please also add > >>>> the following questions. > >>> > >>> Please no. > >>> > >>> This is about the registration form, not a survey. > >>> > >>> .as > >> > >> -- > >> --- > >> Toerless Eckert, eckert@xxxxxxxxx > >> Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture > >> SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy! > >> > >> -- --- Toerless Eckert, eckert@xxxxxxxxx Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!