Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	Somebody point me to see that the date of the post in circleid is April
1st ...

:)

-as

On 4/11/13 11:17 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/10/13 7:55 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>>> There seems to be a faction that feel that 15 years ago someone once
>>>> blacklisted them and caused them some inconvenience, therefore all
>>>> DNSBLs suck forever.  I could say similar things about buggy PC
>>>> implementations of TCP/IP, but I think a few things have changed since
>>>> then, in both cases.
>>>
>>> There's an inherent problem with letting 3rd parties affect email 
>>> traffic, especially when there's no way to hold those 3rd parties 
>>> accountable for negligence or malice.
>>
>> Like I said, things have changed since 1996.  I talk to Spamhaus every
>> day am intimately familiar with their processes, and understand who
>> they report to.
>>
>> In the meantime, see
>>
>> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130301_icann_announces_blocking_usage_review_panel/
>>
> 
> 	Interesting, a discussion perhaps not for this list (but more
> information could be), I am curious of how the review panel is selected,
> when it is going to start to operate, and some others ops things.
> 
> 	I looked around but I couldn't find anything really useful excepts for
> some PRs. So if you have a pointer I would be grateful.
> 
> regards,
> /as
> 




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]