Re: Sufficient email authentication requirements for IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 4/10/13 7:55 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> There seems to be a faction that feel that 15 years ago someone once
>>> blacklisted them and caused them some inconvenience, therefore all
>>> DNSBLs suck forever.  I could say similar things about buggy PC
>>> implementations of TCP/IP, but I think a few things have changed since
>>> then, in both cases.
>>
>> There's an inherent problem with letting 3rd parties affect email 
>> traffic, especially when there's no way to hold those 3rd parties 
>> accountable for negligence or malice.
> 
> Like I said, things have changed since 1996.  I talk to Spamhaus every
> day am intimately familiar with their processes, and understand who
> they report to.
> 
> In the meantime, see
> 
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20130301_icann_announces_blocking_usage_review_panel/
> 

	Interesting, a discussion perhaps not for this list (but more
information could be), I am curious of how the review panel is selected,
when it is going to start to operate, and some others ops things.

	I looked around but I couldn't find anything really useful excepts for
some PRs. So if you have a pointer I would be grateful.

regards,
/as




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]