RE: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There's a lot of hysteresis... because calling it funny is often a stretch.

Lloyd Wood
http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/


________________________________________
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Brim [swb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 April 2013 20:34
To: Lucy Lynch
Cc: ietf; Abdussalam Baryun
Subject: Re: Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April    the first

On 04/08/13 13:35, Lucy Lynch allegedly wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Wes Beebee (wbeebee) wrote:
>
>>
>>> If the date is special then thoes RFCs SHOULD be *historical*.
>>
>> I thought they should be classified as "hysterical".
>
> there is an echo (echo) ((echo) ) in here (here) ((here))

IETF humor has lots of hysteresis.






[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]