Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.

To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 11:32:35 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ietf@xxxxxxxx" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAKRbAfBQjs-tM4xmEN4m+HYqNDswNqoXBNSJTHYZ6h1XS9t8UA@mail.gmail.com>
Thread-index: AQHONDNbJgYBePWyTkqW0aIJcv6jr5jMpngA
Thread-topic: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.

On Apr 8, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Anyway this strikes me as an unfortunate use of those documents.

Although this is not entirely a good thing, it is worth noting that one purpose in creating borders is to lure people across them.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.
  - From: Melinda Shore

References:
- Re: [IETF] Comments for Humorous RFCs or uncategorised RFCs or dated April the first
  - From: John Levine
- Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.
  - From: Hector Santos
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.
  - From: Måns Nilsson
- Re: Proposed solution for DPEP (Diversity Problem Entry Point) - IETF April 1 jokes.
  - From: Melinda Shore