Re: RFC 6921 on Design Considerations for Faster-Than-Light (FTL) Communication

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I too have always found at least one of the Crocker brothers {suspicious, smart, funny, irrelevant, prescient, handsome, annoying, etc.}. I've never been able to tell which is which :)

Sent from my iPad

On Apr 5, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
>>>>>> "Loa" == Loa Andersson <loa@xxxxx> writes:
>    Loa> thinking about this and assuming that the FTL Communication are deployed
>    Loa> in a not too far distant future, wouldn't we have started to receive
>    Loa> packets that was sent in the future already now?
> 
> I for one, have always found these Crocker brothers suspicious: always
> seem to have been at the key points in Internet future history.
> I think that they are in fact a single person.  
> One is going forward in time, and the other one backwards. 
> (Which is which, is still open to debate)
> 
> So I claim that we  will have been receiving packets from the future for
> some time now.
> 
> -- 
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [ 
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [ 
> ]     mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [ 
>    





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]