Re: Missing requirement in draft-sparks-genarea-imaparch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/1/13 6:49 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
May I suggest that the specific details of this be left to the
implementation effort.  What is easy to implement in this area depends
significantly on what platform (and here I mean more imap libraries and
imap server technology than say python vs ruby vs .net vs C) A simple
requirement like the implementation should consider how to handle abuse
of message marking.
Sam - I agree, and was taking a very similar approach in my working copy already.
Let me know if you think -06 has it right.

RjS




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]