On 03/13/13 14:51, Michael StJohns allegedly wrote: > At 02:27 PM 3/13/2013, Dave Crocker wrote: >> So I suggest: >> >> 2. The nominating committee selects candidates based on its >> determination of the requirements for the job, synthesized >> from the desires expressed by the IAB, IESG or IAOC (as >> appropriate), desires express by the community, and from the >> nominating committee's own assessment; it then advises each >> confirming body of its respective candidates; the nominating >> committee shall provide supporting materials that cover its >> selections, including the final version of requirements that >> the nominating committee used when making its selections; >> these requirements shall be made public after nominees are >> confirmed. >> >> >> Comments? >> >> d/ > > > Can the nomcom waive or otherwise ignore "objective" criteria such as "must have been a working group chair"? The confirming body still has control.