Re: Diversity of IETF Leadership

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/10/2013 2:50 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
On 03/10/13 15:43, John Levine allegedly wrote:
     - Each of the confirming bodies (the ISOC Board for the IAB, the
       IAB for the IESG, and the IESG for the IAOC) could make a
       public statement at the beginning of each year's nominations
       process that they will not confirm a slate unless it
       contributes to increased diversity within the IETF leadership,
       or it is accompanied by a detailed explanation of what
       steps were taken to select a more diverse slate and why it was
       not possible to do so.

That sounds a lot like quotas.  Let's not go there.

+1.  We do not want to manage by ideology - consider how well that
serves political parties.

Right.

So is there anything you would like for the confirming bodies to say to Nomcom, that doesn't sound like quotas?

Spencer



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]