Re: Nomcom Reports

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I found your report useful. I intend to produce such a report.

- Matt Lepinski
  nomcom-chair@xxxxxxxx

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the last official Nomcom report was from the
> Nomcom I chaired (2009-2010):
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-barnes-nomcom-report-2009-00.txt
>
> I have a general question for the community as to whether they find
> such reports useful and whether we should encourage future nomcom
> chairs to produce these?  While this is not listed as a requirement in
> RFC 3777, I had understood as chair that this was a requirement for
> the job, but again, I've not seen that carried on.  Personally, I
> don't find a few .ppt charts adequate in terms of summarizing the
> outcome of such an important IETF process.   The Nomcom gains a unique
> insight into the operation of the IETF (and its leadership) that no
> one else gets.
>
> I will note that of the 4 issues that I raised in the report, there
> are 2 that remain critical IMHO:
> - Section 7.1   Diversity.  Out of the leaders across the IAOC, IAB
> and IESG, there is one individual from Asia and one female (both on
> the IAB).
>
> - Section 7.3.  Expertise.  Of course, this is directly related to the
> long thread of discussion underway with regards to filling the
> Transport AD position - i.e., it's the exact same situation faced by
> the 2009-2010 Nomcom.
>
> The other two issues are of course, important, but didn't appear to be
> such an issue for this year's Nomcom.
>
> Regards,
> Mary.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]