Re: Remote Participation Services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Narten <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Thomas> IMO, what is missing is operational Best Practices. We seem
    Thomas> to be lacking them (are any written down?) And we don't
    Thomas> follow them consistently, especially from one WG to
    Thomas> another. Many of the problems I see with remote
    Thomas> participation facilties have to do not with the technology
    Thomas> per se, but with lack of proper training and advance
    Thomas> testing. I get the general sense that getting the remote

+5.

I am setting a deadline for slides for IETF86 for my WG, and I will be
doing a unified slide deck.  I might allow text on a slide to be
updated the day before... but no slides, no speak.


-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sandelman Software Works 


Attachment: pgpBtbahtfLAX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]