Hi, In http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-eastlake-additional-xmlsec-uris-08.txt the References have to be checked and updated. For example, the document has a normative reference to http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-xptr-20020816/ which is a "Superceded" work-in-progress that's over 10 years old. Also, it references "RFC Errata, Errata ID 191, RFC 4051" without linking the errata item, and does so normatively even though the document as a whole would Obsolete RFC 4051. Just to illustrate, I did not review them all myself. The Abstract does not english. I don't think it's a good idea to have the Acknowledgements precede even the Introduction as an exception while most other documents put it near the end. The "XCANON" reference does not work, "xml-enc-c14n-20020718" is perhaps meant to be "xml-exc-c14n-20020718" ("enc" vs "exc"). I've not checked other references. The document makes reference to Canonical XML 1.0 without referencing, e.g. http://www.w3.org/TR/C14N-issues/ (and RFC 3076 does not seem to have any Errata filed to hint at the problems with it). I'm not sure that's a problem, but it might be better to mention the problems with Canonical XML 1.0 in some form. regards, -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/