Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-ft-03.txt> (A Fast-Track way to RFC with Running Code) to Experimental RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Inline.
S.


On 1.14.2013 10:33 , "Marc Petit-Huguenin" <petithug@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA256
>
>On 01/14/2013 01:10 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 10:08, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I think that you underestimate the IETF community, who certainly know
>>>how
>>> to see through all the FUD about the GPL.  Sure it may be a bad idea to
>>> literally copy 300 lines of GPL code in your code, but that does not
>>> apply to what we are talking about, which is reading code.
>> 
>> I have worked for employers before where reading GPL code was considered
>> highly problematic.
>
>Sure, if the IETF is part of your job, and your employer prevents you to
>read
>GPL code (or read Spinoza, or sing under the shower), then do not do it
>for
>the IETF.  Now if your employer does not regulate what you do on your own
>time, then there is no problem here.
>
>If someone said to writers to never read any book that is still
>copyrighted
>because they might be contaminated and that may somehow induce them to
>plagiarize without knowing it, how do you think they would react?

Many would laugh.  Some politicians in Germany, who were recently found
that they plagiarized in the PhD theses, would probably notŠ  Their risk
is low, though.

>There is no
>difference with software - excepted that there a lot more people that
>would
>like us to think that software is different.

This is incorrect.  If you are found to infringe on someone's copyright in
a book you put together, you have a copyright problem (only).  If you are
found to infringe on certain open source licenses (including the GPL
variants, but by no means limited to them), and the rightholder forces you
to take a license, you also have to provide a patent license under terms
you may not like.  Even if you don't take a license, it is quite possible
that you have (by copying GPLed code) provided in implied patent license.

Please don't oversimplify.

Thanks,
Stephan

>
>- -- 
>Marc Petit-Huguenin
>Email: marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
>Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
>
>iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQ89D3AAoJECnERZXWan7EticQAIXvbyfRD/LX9YT+/SiW21Wp
>NBuVji+aAPyGaKvwpQ+G1pqrp74hUk2ylvmqOGi9JWc0/E3H/dhyBbksvEHrbyY8
>1+4fGKtOAUkAW97IaBaWRQT9jbo7w9TytRVz8o3+Gh0b4qTmTHzBh76zXjS5v2RM
>qRHFcCnSitXMUV4Y+PjtP8ZjpTd/J4Ahwsw9xa07WeNQIrfQ3PHYX8tC2xrrAuHm
>1on3qI5FuumDjatWwNMhAb+/Sm0XLOiRJifjQxENOfOPW4JtkEcqi9Us3+7fNFMe
>Z06qtrCC2oflODJw+7xZwguIJe8V+Eu8ea3wNnVaa3tqqBw+twZT/vhBSehrCgrU
>hTSvj9zphutbRK/1xvEkMwggYhUPrwH7GTNKrANYYu8xb9O2MD2OB2OdrwtX4Aax
>Z11lBsY7GC0Vum3X/aa+3UWu2cyiBDcDJym+pOvzOYPGJ7aNpEAdlRIYVdE7KV1t
>1n7SrK960uX2WE9VgFdWptfm9QXGDjW417PDxlunNUzlY6Xb/C2uaQuuR6gZG7Vi
>P3I+Yiz2LvioE3ZwTPDSboLPgbw29g3oEkCBjyfP14KjP2F8MTUfI3S5vTl0ZrAh
>RaqkdT6sfREVxFFszyeAhDDAcXGkzvkZd1wgHwfw1HcKLlTUH6QNPVT5OGsA3DLQ
>7CYGpSyyjONrEgZqxBXD
>=/ZJe
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]