Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Yes, it is possible to add an attribute to a common registry.
> 
> On the other hand it is possible to realign what entries go in which
> registry according to:
> 
> - "reservations" to be in the "main" registry, using a working
>   definition of a "reservation" as something that all implementations
>   of the protocol have to honour.
> 
> - all other IANA special purpose address assignments to be placed in
>   this special purpose registry (including, for example RFC1918 space,
>   6to4 relays, etc), and the RFC to document the process of special
>   purpose assignment.

an N-ary attribute or N lists, semantically about the same, syntax seems
a matter of taste.  i agree with the distinction, and am happy with
either syntax.

randy


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]