Re: Last Call: <draft-bonica-special-purpose-03.txt> (Special-Purpose Address Registries) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/11/2012, at 9:31 AM, Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> hi geoff,
> 
> i get your point.  but it sure is convenient to find everything in one
> place.  can your issues be addressed by adding an attribute(s) to the
> entries?


Convenience vs maning a semantic distinction overt.

Yes, it is possible to add an attribute to a common registry.

On the other hand it is possible to realign what entries go in which registry according to:

- "reservations" to be in the "main" registry, using a working definition of a "reservation" as something that all implementations of the protocol have to honour.

- all other IANA special purpose address assignments to be placed in this special purpose registry (including, for example RFC1918 space, 6to4 relays, etc), and the RFC to document the process of special purpose assignment.


Geoff










[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]