On 11/26/12 2:56 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Pete Resnick
<presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/23/12 7:46 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
http://b.logme.in/2012/11/07/changes-to-hamachi-on-november-19th/
LogMeIn Hamachi is basically a NAT-traversing layer 2 VPN solution. They
avoided conflicts with RFC 1918 space by hijacking IPv4 space in 5/8, now
actively being allocated by LIRs in Europe. When that didn't work (see link
above), they moved to 25/8, allocated to the UK MoD. [...]
By the way, is this an application that the new shared transition space
might benefit?
Yes, like Benson, I am at a loss for why they do not use RFC 6598 addresses.
That's what someone should tell these goofballs to do.
Unfortunately, RFC1918 and RFC 6598 are not enough to number all that
needs numbers.
I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying that Hamachi needs more
than a /10? Or are you saying that other people need more than a /10 and
the 1918 /8, /12, and /16? If so, please explain.
pr
--
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478