On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 11/23/12 7:46 PM, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: >> >> It's Friday. Time to plug IPv6 some more. :-) >> >> http://b.logme.in/2012/11/07/changes-to-hamachi-on-november-19th/ >> >> LogMeIn Hamachi is basically a NAT-traversing layer 2 VPN solution. They >> avoided conflicts with RFC 1918 space by hijacking IPv4 space in 5/8, now >> actively being allocated by LIRs in Europe. When that didn't work (see link >> above), they moved to 25/8, allocated to the UK MoD. While I'm almost sure >> that they haven't got it quite so wrong this time, following the comments >> says that the idea was not only a very bad one to start with, it's cost a >> lot of people a lot of grief that IPv6 was clearly going to mitigate in >> renumbering. Perhaps it is why they recommend it per default, if not for >> the number of applications that would be broken by it. >> >> By the way, is this an application that the new shared transition space >> might benefit? >> > > > Yes, like Benson, I am at a loss for why they do not use RFC 6598 addresses. > That's what someone should tell these goofballs to do. > Unfortunately, RFC1918 and RFC 6598 are not enough to number all that needs numbers. Lots of love, Goofball > pr > > -- > Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 >