Hi Roger, On 14 Nov. 2012, at 10:42 , Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 3:45 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The IESG has received a request from the Locator/ID Separation Protocol >> WG (lisp) to consider the following document: >> - 'LISP EID Block' >> <draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt> as Informational RFC >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-11-27. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> This is a direction to IANA to allocate a /16 IPv6 prefix for use >> with the Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP). The prefix will be >> used for local intra-domain routing and global endpoint >> identification, by sites deploying LISP as EID (Endpoint IDentifier) >> addressing space. > > I have to ask, who can request an netblock from this address space and > from where? Who: whoever is willing to deploy LISP. Where: your RIR? > I might be blind but I couldn't find it mentioned anywhere. > The purpose of the document is not to create a new way to distribute prefixes with its own policies, rather to use the existing "process" but just creating a code point specific for LISP. Luigi > > > -- > > Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE > rogerj@xxxxxxxxx | - IPv6 is The Key! > http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@xxxxxxxxxxxx