Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: George Willingmyre <gtw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
From: Randy Bush <randy@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 09:30:39 +0900
Cc: IETF Disgust <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3E70ED28A6F640BC9A6AD0C1275FC501@gtwassociates>
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)

let's be simple here.  'late' would seem to be any time after there was
a reasonable expectation that you knew there was a document on which
there was ipr.

randy

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
  - From: George Willingmyre

References:
- Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
  - From: Stephan Wenger
- Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
  - From: George Willingmyre

Prev by Date: Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL/ NEA IPR issues...
Next by Date: Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
Previous by thread: Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
Next by thread: Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]