Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephan:

>> Based on the number of late disclosures that are occurring, it is clear
>> to us that we need to use very plain language to explain the
>> responsibilities to participants.
> 
> That's an interesting statement.  To summarize the (long) message below, I
> don't think that empirical data supports that there are any significant
> numbers of disclosures of which it is likely that they are "late".

If the disclosure is made after the document completes WG Last Call, then it is late in the IETF standards process.  When the disclosure comes after this point in the process, then we need to loop back and redo some steps.

Russ





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]