Re: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

[tglassey <tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 11/6/2012 12:46 PM, Eric Burger wrote:

Way too simple, straightforward, and easy to understand. Can't we play lawyer-on-the-list and make it a full page again?

--
Sent from my mobile device. Thanks be to lemonade! http://www.standardstrack.com/ietf/lemonade/

-----Original message-----

From: IETF Chair <chair@xxxxxxxx>
To: IETF Announce <ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: IETF <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tue, Nov 6, 2012 15:01:59 GMT+00:00
Subject: IESG Considering a Revision to NOTE WELL

The IESG is considering a revision to the NOTE WELL text. Please review and comment.

Russ



=== Proposed Revised NOTE WELL Text ===

Note Well

This summary is only meant to point you in the right direction, and
doesn't have all the nuances. The IETF's IPR Policy is set forth in
BCP 79; please read it carefully.

The brief summary:
- By participating with the IETF, you agree to follow IETF processes.
- If you are aware that a contribution of yours (something you write,
say, or discuss in any IETF context) is covered by patents or patent
applications, you need to disclose that fact.

There is no penalty for NOT DISCLOSING and that is the issue.

- You understand that meetings might be recorded, broadcast, and
publicly archived.

So this is the Privacy Waiver Statement.

For further information: Talk to a chair, ask an Area Director, or
review BCP 9 (on the Internet Standards Process), BCP 25 (on the
Working Group processes), BCP 78 (on the IETF Trust), and BCP 79 (on
Intellectual Property Rights in the IETF).

-- 
Regards TSG
"Ex-Cruce-Leo"

//Confidential Mailing - Please destroy this if you are not the intended recipient.