On Oct 23, 2012, at 11:34 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Let's in fact try: Hi guys, we need to fix STD 66 > because it doesn't define error handling. Help me, I am just not getting it: Why do you insist on 'fixing STD 66'? What is the reason you are not willing to reframe the problem to 'fixing how we get from the provided string -the input to the reference construction process- to a STD-66-valid result'? To me this is really what you are aiming at and dropping the 'fix the URI spec' language would get everyone on board immediately in my perception. Jan