> From: Doug Barton <dougb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> recalling someone from one of these positions _should_ be hard to do,
> and should not be undertaken lightly.
No disagreement there - but we're not trying to recall him because of actions
he took, things he said, etc, etc.
Like I said, I think the US's federal constitution is a useful model here: it
has a very onerous process (impeachment and trial) with a high final bar
(2/3) for actions taken in response to what someone did/said, but a wholly
different, simpler and easier process (majority of Cabinet) for sidelining
someone because of incapacity.
And I doubt anyone here is seriously going to argue that Marshall is not
fulfulling his role...
> From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx>
> I am curious to know whether or not there are people who feel that
> Marshall shouldn't be considered to have quit IAOC. If there's nobody
> who feels that way I'm personally great with going ahead without a
> recall.
Exactly.
Noel