On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Jan Algermissen wrote:Anne's spec defines how you get from any arbitrary string (plus a base
>
> The point is that what you and Anne are addressing is parsing of URI
> *References* not URIs.
URL) to a data structure with fields like scheme, hostname, port, path,
etc. The input can be absolute, completely invalid, the empty string,
whatever.
Sounds useful but does not sound really like Anne's spec is "defining URLs", however. Clarifying the language in your spec ought to resolve any possible confusion.
That's certainly part of the required work, yes. It's not all of it.
> This is why any references to fixing or aligning URI syntax with reality
> is besides the point and not neccessary. All that you (we) deal with is
> URI references and how to parse them to yield valid URIs.
Is there a list of issues that you and Anne are working from for this? If there indeed is a need to update the URI/IRI RFC's to address specific problems I'm sure it wouldn't take much effort to draft up an I-D. I'd be more than willing to help out with such an effort.
[snip]I think the person doing the work has the prerogative to do it wherever he
or she wants to do it. Maybe the IETF should consider why Anne isn't doing
it in the IETF.
Indeed. Good question: Anne, is there are particular reason why you chose not to pursue this work as an I-D? Let's get that particular issue resolved.
- James
Consensus isn't a value I hold highly, but review of Anne's work is
> > The specs don't define everything that implementations have to do to
> > be interoperable. If the IETF doesn't think that's a problem, then
> > that's fine, but then y'all shouldn't be surprised when people who
> > _do_ think that's a problem try and fix it.
>
> Yes, please fix *that*, but *just* that without messing with the basics
> without consensus/review.
welcome.
If the IETF community didn't want Anne to do this work, then the IETF
community should have done it. Having not done it, having not even
understood that the problem exists, means the IETF has lost the
credibility it needs to claim that this is in the IETF's domain.
You don't get to claim authority over an area while at the same time
telling someone else "please fix that" for the hard work that comes with
that area. The reality is, he who does the hard work, gets the authority.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'