Richard Barnes wrote:
> Document: draft-ietf-6man-udpzero-06
It's interesting that the draft denies the following statements
in RFC2765:
Fragmented IPv4 UDP packets that do not contain a UDP checksum (i.e.
the UDP checksum field is zero) are not of significant use over
wide-areas in the Internet and will not be translated by the
translator.
While the draft considers only tunnels and states:
IPv6 middlebox
deployment is not yet as prolific as it is in IPv4. Thus, relatively
few current middleboxes may actually block IPv6 UDP with a zero
checksum.
interactions between the draft and existing implementations
of RFC2765 will be quite exciting.
The following statement of the draft:
The computed checksum
value may be cached (before adding the Length field) for each flow
/destination and subsequently combined with the Length of each
packet to minimise per-packet processing.
is bogus, because searching cache means a lot more effort than
recomputing checksum.
Masataka Ohta