Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave:

>>> This second basis looks sufficiently broad and vague to invite its
>>> own abuse and certainly inconsistent application.  Did IETF counsel
>>> express comfort with this language?
> >
>> Counsel has been consulted.  After exchanging several messages, this
>> is the resulting text.  This text was never a part that was edited in
>> the exchange.
> 
> You are saying that IETF Counsel did not offer comment on this bit of text?
> 
> Actually, I note that you didn't actually answer my question:  Does the IETF Counsel like the text?

While counsel offered comment on other parts of the text, none were offered on the part you cite.  I am sure that comments would have been offered on the part you cite if it caused concern.

Russ


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]