Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/13/2012 9:23 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
There were times when there were no rights granted explicitly, at least. I indicated the three ranges in a previous mail.

Joe

On 9/13/2012 8:40 PM, John Levine wrote:
I'm not sure I understand this analogy.  Are you saying that there are
IPR issues related to making expired drafts available?

Yes. Depends on the IDs, when they were authored, and which version of
the boilerplate they contain.

Can you give a concrete example of an I-D with this problem? I don't ever
recall a time when the grant of rights to the IETF had a time limit.

For instance - how do you deal with an ID which was originally published under one set of IP rights and another later one - or a derivative work which is published under a separate set of rights - which functionally contravenes or sets aside those original rights authorizations?

This is a serious issue.

Todd

R's,
John



-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2437/5267 - Release Date: 09/13/12




--
//Confidential Mailing - Please destroy this if you are not the intended recipient.



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]