Re: New Version Notification for: draft-baryun-rfc2119-update-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi SM,

Thanks for your comments, I will note your feedback and follow to read
into these issues as you advise, thanking you,

Best Regards
AB
======

On 8/1/12, SM <sm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At 11:19 AM 8/1/2012, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>>Yes my concern is how/when use terms not meaning of terms. Ok,  What
>>about "MUST" (every one know it), wasn't it clear as "if then", please
>>explain why capital?
>
> You are probably receiving feedback on your draft because the WG
> sessions this week are boring. :-)  The is a thread about "all caps"
> at http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg73338.html  I
> suggest reading RFC 1122 and RFC 1123 to get a view of how some
> specifications were written and why they were written in such a way.
>
> Melinda Shore provided some good advice (
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg74191.html ).  I
> would not say that your draft is not helpful.  It is up to you to
> assess whether draft-baryun-rfc2119-update-00 can gain IETF Consensus.
>
> Regards,
> -sm
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]