Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




20 jul 2012 kl. 16:09 skrev "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@xxxxxxx>:

> +1
> 
> Although I wonder whether radical openness would be cheaper in the long run: Put everything online and have an auto-responder at subpoena@xxxxxxxx that says "Go look it up yourself."
> 

I could think of some other things it could say too...

> --Richard
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 20, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Jul 20, 2012, at 9:07 AM, IETF Administrative Director wrote:
>> 
>>> The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed policy by the IAOC to impose 
>>> fees to produce information and authenticate documents in response to subpoenas and 
>>> other legal requests.
>>> 
>>> The IETF receives requests for information, documentation, authentication or other 
>>> matters through subpoenas and less formal means that require manpower and materials 
>>> to be expended.  These requests are on the rise. During the period 2005 to 2010 the IETF 
>>> responded to nine subpoenas.  Since 2011 the IETF has received five subpoenas and three 
>>> other legal requests for authenticated documents.  
>>> 
>>> Each such request is time sensitive and involves the IETF Counsel, the IAD, and members 
>>> of the IAOC, who together form the Legal Management Committee, to rapidly analyze and 
>>> identify the means for satisfying the request.  Often there is a need to retain outside counsel, 
>>> especially in cases that might lead to depositions or court testimony. 
>>> 
>>> The IAOC believes a Schedule of Fees is an appropriate and reasonable means to recover 
>>> costs associated with such efforts.
>>> 
>>> The draft policy entitled Draft Fee Policy for Legal Requests can be found 
>>> at: <http://iaoc.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html>
>>> 
>>> Before adopting a policy the IAOC would like feedback on this before making a 
>>> decision.  Comments appreciated to ietf@xxxxxxxx by 6 August 2012.
>>> 
>>> Ray Pelletier
>>> IETF Administrative Director
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> LGTM++.
>> 
>> Seems like a grand idea -- who knows, may even help avoid nuisance suits (although the fees are so small (compared to all the other costs) that I don't hold much hope of this…).
>> 
>> W
>> 
>> --
>> For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
>>               -- H. L. Mencken
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]