+1 and for the current thread, case is format... Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On 5/16/12 12:26 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote: >> >> And of course if we had a slightly richer publication format we could > >> use, oh, say, underline, bold, italics and maybe even a special font >> for normative terms, but I guess I am dreaming decades ahead... > >Although I too dream the impossible dream, I would prefer not to trust >in formatting to enforce the semantic distinction in this instance. > >Peter /d -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net via mobile