> From: John C Klensin [john-ietf@xxxxxxx] > > > Remind me: > > Is bold must more or less compelling that underlined must. And > > where does uppercase MUST fit in? > > > > I fear the slightly richer publication format will give rise > > to a slightly more complex revision of RFC 2119. > > Let's try to remember that many of the comments/ requests for > alternate publication formats have been to make "display" more a > function of the devices being used. Depending on type style > variations (style, size, font variations, underlining, etc.) > would pretty much defeat that particular claimed requirement. > As I take Sam's note to sort of point out, even the use of > uppercase to imply specific semantics can be problematic; we > should at least strive to not make things worse, IMO. I'm looking forward to the normative use of <BLINK>...</BLINK>. Dale