Re: Is the IETF aging?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi John,
At 10:43 04-05-2012, John C Klensin wrote:
garb on a regular basis is unreasonable.  So, unless we want to
send the message that all of the senior members of the community
are necessarily male (and inclined to grow beards), we need to
find another term.

The term SIR was proposed instead of male and knighted.

IETF's sub-UI work.  Until and unless that case is made, I think
we need to be absolutely sure that capable and promising women
have at least as much opportunity to make useful contributions
in the IETF --including taking on leadership roles-- as capable
and promising men.  But, even a step or two in the direction of

There hasn't been any response to the gender note sent to another IETF mailing list a few days ago. It's one thing to provide opportunities for women; making it happen is another story. If you or anyone else know anyone who is interested, I'll contribute.

Let me also make a suggestion that I hope is constructive: the
newcomers meet-and-greet may be really helpful in giving the new
people a chance to meet some of those they should be working
with.   It would work better if a larger fraction of the
leadership sought out newcomers to talk with rather than
treating it as a pre-welcome-reception opportunity to talk with
each other, but I don't know how it fix that.   However those

It has an air of formality.  It's a constructive step though.

Currently, there's a two hour session for newcomers with around 65 slides. It's a lot of content, a lot of acronyms and a lot of rules and sub-rules. There's also a two hour session about how to create I-D at the same time. The newcomer has to choose between learning about the IETF or learning how to create I-Ds. They then go into a room full of strange people where it is a miss and hit affair like Internet dating.

newcomer sessions don't --I suggest can't-- work for forming
mentoring relationships for two reasons.  First, the people who
should be most available for mentoring are those with
significant IETF experience who do not have present WG Chair,
IESG, or IAB responsibilities.  But those people are excluded
from the newcomers meet and greet sessions.  Second, it is just
too early, especially since we, as a community, have little
control over who will be back the second and third time and the
second and third year.  So I suggest we think about how to put
together 2nd-comer or 3rd-comer opportunities with potential
(and committed) mentors available and other attendance limited
to self-selected relatively new people (but normally not
first-timers) who are interested in that kind of experience and
support.

The 2nd-comer and 2rd-comer idea is interesting. There is free time and free rooms on tutorial day. How about getting a room, get people who are interested in there and send an informal invitation to the attendees? You could even have affinity groups to avoid the old-boys club atmosphere.

Regards,
-sm


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]