Dear Brian; On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear IAOC, > > I suggest that your standard dealings with local hosts should > include requiring them to perform a local check on whether the > standard "Note Well" takes account of all local legal requirements, > including for example consent to publication of images. If it doesn't, > the host should provide an augmented "Note Well" for use during > meeting registration. > > From the recent discussion, this needs to be done for sure for > IETF 87. The legal subcommittee (which includes the IETF counsel) is actively researching this issue. Regards Marshall > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 2012-04-25 00:30, John C Klensin wrote: >> >> --On Tuesday, 24 April, 2012 18:19 -0500 "James M. Polk" >> <jmpolk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> IETF 87 is in Germany (15 months from now), so we'd better >>> solve this issue soon, I should think. >> >> The IESG and IAOC are invited to take my comments on the >> situation as an appeal against the decision to hold that meeting >> unless either the situation can be clarified with counsel to the >> degree that we understand that Martin's concerns are not >> applicable, that appropriate permission language and permissions >> can be clarified with Counsel so that a binding between >> registration and permission is possible and used, or that a >> community consensus call demonstrates that the community >> believes that the "just make lists" plan is preferable to having >> the option to take pictures. >> >> And that is my last comment on the subject unless I have to >> formalize such an appeal. >> >> john >> >> . >>