Hi Stewart, > >> The NVO3 WG will write the following informational RFCs, which > >> must be substantially complete before rechartering can be > >> considered: > > > > "substantially complete" is sufficiently subjective to risk a riot at some point > > in the future! > > Can we be more precise with some well-known process step such as WG last > > call or publication request. > > I do not believe that rechartering at that point would take more than a couple > > of weeks, so it is not as though the WG will grind to a halt for a season. > > > >> Problem Statement > >> Framework document > >> Control plane requirements document > >> Data plane requirements document > >> Operational Requirements > >> Gap Analysis > > Perhaps we should set WGLC as the marker for recharter to be considered. That would work for me. A