On 23/04/12 12:14, Joel jaeggli wrote:
On 4/22/12 20:44 , Tobias Gondrom wrote:
Hi Russ,
from a privacy perspective: may I ask for what purpose you propose to
publish the blue sheets (with the names of all WG session attendees)
with the proceedings?
AFAIK, at the moment the blue sheets are basically available on request
especially in case of IP questions. What would lead to the proposal to
publish the list of names of attendees always with the proceedings?
The attendee list is published with the proceedings already.
I know.
The blue sheets are role call and accountability for a public meeting.
I understand that. But my question would be why do we need/want to
publish the blue sheets with the proceedings?
Best regards, Tobias
Ps.: btw. though I might be the only one, but I liked the blue sheet
replacement experiment (RFID) in Hiroshima...
On 22/04/12 22:31, IETF Chair wrote:
At IETF 83, we had a discussion about the future of blue sheets, many
spoke at the mic in support of the proposal. There has been very
little discussion on the mail list. However, all of the discussion
that I have see has been very supportive.
The suggestion is three blue sheet changes:
1. No longer ask for email address;
2. Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for
the WG session; and
3. Discard paper blue sheets after scanning.
Please speak up if you think this is the wrong thing to do.
Thanks,
Russ