On 4/22/12 20:44 , Tobias Gondrom wrote: > Hi Russ, > > from a privacy perspective: may I ask for what purpose you propose to > publish the blue sheets (with the names of all WG session attendees) > with the proceedings? > AFAIK, at the moment the blue sheets are basically available on request > especially in case of IP questions. What would lead to the proposal to > publish the list of names of attendees always with the proceedings? The attendee list is published with the proceedings already. The blue sheets are role call and accountability for a public meeting. > Best regards, Tobias > > > Ps.: btw. though I might be the only one, but I liked the blue sheet > replacement experiment (RFID) in Hiroshima... > > > > On 22/04/12 22:31, IETF Chair wrote: >> At IETF 83, we had a discussion about the future of blue sheets, many >> spoke at the mic in support of the proposal. There has been very >> little discussion on the mail list. However, all of the discussion >> that I have see has been very supportive. >> >> The suggestion is three blue sheet changes: >> 1. No longer ask for email address; >> 2. Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for >> the WG session; and >> 3. Discard paper blue sheets after scanning. >> >> Please speak up if you think this is the wrong thing to do. >> >> Thanks, >> Russ >