Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/20/2012 6:36 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
What about the idea of requiring new Experimental documents to
include text that indicates when the experiment is to be considered
completed absent new work on it?  Essentially, the document declares
a date by which the experiment is considered concluded,
...
To Eliot's point, work that is resumed much later could always
restore document and code point status and declare new drop-dead
dates when it becomes interesting again.


As Brian notes, "dates" are probably unlikely to be useful while also imposing additional administrative tracking overhead.

On the other hand, objective performance/achievement criteria --
statements that describe what experiential information is being sought
-- would be useful to encourage.

d/

--


--
 Dave Crocker
 bbiw.net


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]