Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> ... and yes, renumbering IS that big a deal. > > We could go on having this argument, or we could take constructive steps > to deal with the new flexibility that we have gained from IPv6, which indeed > leads to new problems to solve as we start to use that flexibility. The problem of IPv6 is that it was so poorly architected that it is fundamentally broken. Expected new flexibility had resulted in just new complications for nothing, which causes the new problems. > Oh look, we have WGs tackling those problems: MIF, HOMENET, 6RENUM, and > of course V6OPS. Do look. They are adding even new problems without any flexibility, of course. Masataka Ohta