>>>>> "ned" == ned <ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
ned> Is this really a big enough problem to be worth solving? I
ned> can't recall a single instance where I received IETF list with
ned> a problematic attachment. OTOH, I routinely get IETF messages
ned> with useful attachements - typically a critical revision to a
ned> draft which for whatever reason can't be posted as an I-D -
ned> that I really need to be able see without having to bother with
I regard those situation as a violation of process.
If that ID can't go on an HTTP site, then something is missing.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
Attachment:
pgpe6BywDU4kX.pgp
Description: PGP signature