Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Relevant?  Yes.
Gating?  No.

In fact, I would put it the other way around.
The architecture documentis very useful, almost necessary, for deciding whether the solution is a good one. The cache management evaluations are another component of such an evaluation. Even understanding the cache management quesiton is made significantly easier by having a clean architecture description.

Yours,
Joel

On 3/14/2012 10:40 AM, John Scudder wrote:
One further remark:

On Mar 13, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
...
It may take engineering and evaluating some cache management schemes
before one can decide whether the archtiecture is a good one.
...

Agreed.

Isn't it relevant to the architecture document, that it be possible for a reader to judge whether the architecture is a good one or not?

--John


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]