You might want to wait for any other LC comments before updating.
Thanks,
Andy
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha) <mustapha.aissaoui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ooops. Thank you for pointing this out Stewart. I will make the update and publish a new revision.
Mustapha.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:48 PM
To: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; pwe3@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
Authors
There was on point that I notice that you did not address from the AD review and so I am picking it up as a LC comment:
In section 10 you say:
"This document makes the following update to the PwOperStatusTC
textual convention in RFC5542 [8]: "
This update should be recorded in the metadata (top left front page) and it is usual to put a one line note in the abstract.
Stewart
On 07/03/2012 17:00, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to
> Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document:
> - 'Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit'
> <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> Abstract
>
>
> This document describes a mechanism for standby status signaling of
> redundant pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set
> of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in
> single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications, or between
> terminating provider edge (T-PE) nodes in multi-segment pseudowire
> (MS-PW) applications.
>
> In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use
> for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is needed
> to indicate a preferential forwarding status of Active or Standby for
> each PW in a redundant set.
>
> In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to
> coordinate a switchover operation of the PW.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ballot/
>
>
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf