Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3 mar 2012, at 16:56, ned+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Doubtful. If a record needs to have, say, a priority field, or a port number,
> given the existence of MX, SRV, and various other RRs it's going to be very
> difficult for the designers of said field to argue that that should be done as
> ASCII text that has to be parsed out to use.

Agree with you but too many people today "just" program in perl och python where the parsing is just a cast or similar, and they do not understand this argument of yours -- which I once again completely stand behind myself.

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]