Re: DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In your little dialog, the boss was entirely reasonable -- the practical benefit from implementing SPF records would be zip.

Or, put more simply, your conclusion seems to be that we can never add
new RRs. Given that adding new RRs is crucial to the growth of the
Internet, I reject that conclusion completely.

No, I'm saying that it would be a lot more productive to help people improve their provisioning systems, rather than say how stupid they are for not doing what we want. Even now, there are precious few provisioning systems that support AAAA records, and even fewer that support DNSSEC. I hacked support for AAAA into mine, but as far as I can tell, none of my users other than me is using them. I added SPF records, but then took them out when my DNS mirror complained that he was getting strange error messages.

By the way, what's your opinion of draft-levine-dnsextlang-02?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@xxxxxxxx, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]