RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Kitterman
> Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 7:23 AM
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting-08.txt> (SPF
> Authentication Failure Reporting using the Abuse Report Format) to
> Proposed Standard
> 
> Based on that, I think that the sentence in paragraph 6 could be lost
> without losing anything important, so I think it should stay as it is.

Yes, I suggest that the sentence that comprises Section 6 proper can be dropped.  The text currently in 6.1 can be moved up to 6, and the current 6.1 thus removed.

> It might be worth someone looking at draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report-10
> again to see if that's really appropriate.

I'll take a second look.

-MSK, MARF co-chair
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]