Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple MailTransfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities)to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 5:43 AM
> - Appendix D: "This appendix and its subsections are informative."  I think
that (a) any appendix is informative, because normative text doesn't belong in
an appendix; and (b) the normative stuff uses RFC2119 language and this doesn't.
Thus, I think this sentence should be removed.  (I know I've lost this argument
before, but I'll make another stand here anyway.)
>
I hope that you lose again:-)  I am always confused, since I see a substantial
number of normative appendices and so want it clearly spelt out, is it
informative, what happens when the body clashes with the appendices etc etc.

Tom Petch

> -MSK

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]