Re: ITC copped out on UTC again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



james woodyatt <jhw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> TAI has a fairly stable foundation in non-relativistic physics, which
> experience has shown to be somewhat resistant to the power of political
> bodies to modify at will,

Actually TAI depends a lot on relativity as well as quantum physics. For
example, it is supposed to match the rate of the SI second on the geoid
(which is roughly mean sea level). NIST's lab in Colorado is about a mile
high, so they have to apply a general relativistic rate correction to
their atomic clocks because of their gravitational potential.

> so it should be good enough for most running code on the Internet.

Except where that code needs UTC.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
Viking, North Utsire: Southerly or southeasterly 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8
in Viking. Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough in Viking. Showers.
Good.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]