On Feb 2, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Erik Kline wrote: > World IPv6 Launch changes the relevance of this document greatly, I > think. Since this would be published after the announcement of World > IPv6 Launch, I think the document should be updated to discuss its own > applicability in a post- World IPv6 Launch Internet. With respect... The document was originally discussed in v6ops, and you chose to not comment. It went through last call there in January 2011 and was sent to the IESG. IESG review took until April, and an updated draft was posted at the end of May 2011. At IETF 81 (Quebec City) we were able to have you, the author, and some others discuss it. The IESG again decided it needed a revised draft, and that draft - in large part, a rewrite - arrived in October. v6ops had a second WGLC, in which you again declined to comment, although you may have seen Lorenzo's comments, which were picked up in a November version of the draft. Ralph and Jari finally cleared their "discuss" ballots a couple of weeks ago, and we are having a second IETF last call. I'd like to understand your objective here. I know that you don't care for the draft, and at least at one point took it as a somewhat-personal attack. Is your objective to prevent the draft's publication entirely, or do you think that there is value in publishing it given a productive response to this comment? At what point are you willing to either participate in the public dialog or choose to not comment at all? > On 2 February 2012 00:09, The IESG <iesg-secretary@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Operations WG (v6ops) to >> consider the following document: >> - 'Considerations for Transitioning Content to IPv6' >> <draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-08.txt> as an >> Informational RFC >> >> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits >> final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the >> ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-02-15. Exceptionally, comments may be >> sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the >> beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >> >> Abstract >> >> >> This document describes considerations for the transition of end user >> content on the Internet to IPv6. While this is tailored to address >> end user content, which is typically web-based, many aspects of this >> document may be more broadly applicable to the transition to IPv6 of >> other applications and services. This document explores the >> challenges involved in the transition to IPv6, potential migration >> tactics, possible migration phases, and other considerations. The >> audience for this document is the Internet community generally, >> particularly IPv6 implementers. >> >> >> >> >> The file can be obtained via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications/ >> >> IESG discussion can be tracked via >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications/ >> >> >> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> v6ops mailing list >> v6ops@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf